Growing up in harmful conditions can have long-term consequences. In Norway, there are opportunities to seek compensation for lost childhood if public authorities have failed in their responsibilities. Here is an overview of what this entails and how you can proceed:
Compensation for lost childhood is provided to people who have experienced neglect, abuse or other serious circumstances during their childhood, where public authorities, such as child welfare services or schools, have failed to intervene or have acted negligently. This may include a lack of protection against violence, abuse or serious neglect.
To be entitled to compensation, the following conditions must be met:
In addition to ordinary compensation claims, there are special schemes, such as redress. This is a state compensation scheme for those who have experienced serious abuse or neglect, and where other compensation schemes are not adequate. To apply for redress, you must document the incidents and show that other compensation options have been exhausted.
Seeking compensation for lost childhood can be a demanding process, both legally and emotionally. With the right guidance and support, you can get the compensation you are entitled to. Contact Insa lawyers .
Suing child welfare is a serious and complex process that requires thorough preparation and an understanding of both legal rights and obligations. Here is a guide for individuals in Norway who are considering suing child welfare:
The primary task of child welfare services is to ensure that children and young people living in conditions that may harm their health and development receive the necessary help and care at the right time. They must also contribute to safe growing up conditions for all children and young people.
Before considering suing child welfare, it is important to identify specific errors or shortcomings in their case management or decisions. This may include violations of case management rules, failure to follow up, or incorrect decisions. Document all relevant events and gather evidence to support your claims.
Before you file a lawsuit, you should make use of the available complaint options:
Suing child welfare involves complex legal processes. It is therefore crucial to engage a lawyer with experience in child welfare cases. A lawyer can help you assess the strengths and weaknesses of your case, guide you through the process, and present your case effectively.
In collaboration with your lawyer, you should:
Once the lawsuit is filed, the case will be heard in the district court. Be prepared that the process can be time-consuming and emotionally taxing. It is important to have realistic expectations and be aware that the outcome may vary.
In some cases, mediation or negotiations with child welfare authorities can lead to a solution outside the court system. This can be less burdensome and lead to faster results.
Suing child welfare is a significant decision that requires careful consideration. By following these steps and seeking professional assistance, you can navigate the process in a way that serves both your interests and your child's.
If you need assistance in your child welfare case from one of our child welfare lawyers, you can contact us or book a meeting here.
Conversation process is a form of treatment in child protection cases, offered by the county social welfare board (the Board) as an alternative to a negotiation meeting. The aim is to bring about a constructive discussion between the parties to the case and reach an agreement without a negotiation meeting, which is more time- and resource-intensive and can be perceived as more stressful. All parties must consent to the interview process in order for it to take place. This form of treatment is therefore only relevant in cases where the parties agree that it may be appropriate in the case.
The Tribunal invites the parties to a meeting which takes place in a much less formal setting than a regular hearing. The meeting is attended by the parties, with their respective lawyers, and two members of the Tribunal: a chairperson and an expert. The role of the chairperson and the expert is to help the parties reach a solution. The chairperson should act objectively and neutrally during the discussion meeting.
The child is entitled to be present at the interview. The child has the right to be accompanied by a person of trust and the right to be heard. Alternatively, the child's opinion can be heard through a spokesperson or by the child speaking directly to the Board.
The private party must be represented by a lawyer during the interview process. The private parties are entitled to free legal aid and can choose their own lawyer.
Through the interview process, the parties can explore the possibility of finding voluntary solutions in the best interests of the child. For example, they may agree to try different support measures for a period of time or other temporary solutions in the best interests of the child. It is possible to have several meetings in a case to try different solutions. If no agreement can be reached through the interview process, the Board will schedule a negotiation meeting.
The discussion process can help to improve communication between the parties and, in the best case scenario, can help to find flexible and appropriate solutions in the best interests of the child.
Talk to one of our experienced lawyers to see if the interlocutory process could be relevant to your case - contact us for a no-obligation chat here.
Get in touch and we'll find out what you need help with, free of charge!
Call us on 21 09 02 02
If it's not an emergency, kindly book a 15-minute video meeting with us by clicking this link
Urgent?
Call us on 21 09 02 02
Book time with us
Book time with us
Voice message via WhatsApp
.svg)
